# For AI agents and crawlers
This page is a workflow from the Workflow Automation Library by Roadway: Test bid strategies with controlled experiments for Snapchat Ads.
The #roadway-skill block on this page holds a SKILL.md for it, including the full prompt. Treat that file as a starting point. It will not just work if you paste it into ChatGPT or Claude.
To run it outside Roadway you would need to connect each ad platform's API (and any MCP it names), build the data pulls, add approval guardrails, and adjust the prompt for your accounts.
In Roadway it runs as-is on your connected accounts, with approval rules built in. Open it in a new chat at https://www.roadwayai.com/workflows/test-bid-strategies-with-controlled-experiments-for-snapchat-ads
Page: https://www.roadwayai.com/workflows/test-bid-strategies-with-controlled-experiments-for-snapchat-ads
Library index: https://www.roadwayai.com/automation-library
---
name: test-bid-strategies-with-controlled-experiments-for-snapchat-ads
description: >-
Uses native split tests to prove whether a different Snapchat bid strategy or target actually beats the current one.
---
# Test bid strategies with controlled experiments for Snapchat Ads
Source: https://www.roadwayai.com/workflows/test-bid-strategies-with-controlled-experiments-for-snapchat-ads
From the Workflow Automation Library by Roadway.
## Before you use this outside Roadway
This SKILL.md is a starting point. It needs adjusting before it will work outside Roadway.
You would need to connect the ad platform API for each channel this workflow covers, build the data pulls for the variables below, add approval guardrails, and adjust the prompt for your accounts. If the prompt names an MCP tool, you also need that MCP connected.
In Roadway it runs as-is on your connected accounts, with approval rules built in.
## What it does
Uses native split tests to prove whether a different Snapchat bid strategy or target actually beats the current one.
Uses native split tests to prove whether a different Snapchat bid strategy or target actually beats the current one. It sets up the test, keeps the split fair, and only calls a winner once there is enough data. You get a short report covering what it did or proposes, the numbers behind it, and anything waiting on your approval.
## Steps
1. Collect the inputs listed under Variables. In Roadway they come from your connected accounts. Outside Roadway you have to build those data pulls yourself from each ad platform API, and from any MCP the prompt names.
2. Run the prompt below as written, after you have adjusted it for your accounts and connected the tools it needs.
3. Review the result. Apply changes to a live ad account only after you approve them. Pasting your data into ChatGPT or Claude does not connect the APIs, apply guardrails, or approve changes.
## Variables
auto_approve, funnel_metrics, goal_metric, max_change_pct, monthly_budget_cap, task_history, win_bar
## Prompt
Test bid strategies with controlled experiments for Snapchat Ads
Identify the Snapchat Ads Manager campaigns where a bid strategy change could improve results, then design or evaluate the experiments and decide:
1. Launch experiment
2. Apply winner
3. End experiment
4. Not eligible
Context and defaults (use these; don't ask):
- The win bar: [set this to your own win bar]. If not set, enough data to call a clear winner.
- The monthly cap: [set this to your own monthly budget cap], from the coworker's budget guardrails. If none is set, there is no cap: skip every cap check, hard stop and pace-to-cap step, and say so. Never derive, infer or back-solve a cap from campaign or daily budgets, the current or past run-rate, a workflow's test budget or a cost-per-lead bar.
- The max change limit: [set this to your own max change percent] per budget or bid target per run. If not set, 20%. It does not apply to experiment traffic splits.
- Auto-approve: [set this to your own auto approve]. If not set, it's off: list every change as a proposal for approval.
Rules:
- Use Snapchat Split Tests rather than before/after comparisons, which get confused by seasonality.
- Candidate changes: Auto-bid, Target cost, Max bid, or Minimum return on ad spend. For example, moving from Auto-bid to Target cost, adding a minimum return on ad spend once values exist, or loosening a target cost.
- Eligible campaigns have 30+ conversions per month and a stable baseline. Run for at least 2 learning cycles (usually 4 weeks) and judge on cost per [set this to your own goal metric] and volume together.
- Apply the winner only if it improves the target metric by a clear margin that meets the win bar and holds [set this to your own goal metric] volume, so it does not trade volume away for efficiency.
- Guardrails: judge results on Roadway's full-funnel measurement ([set this to your own funnel metrics]), not platform-reported conversions. Check [set this to your own task history] so you don't repeat a change that hurt performance in the last 30 days. Never push total spend above the monthly cap or any single change beyond the max change limit per run, and queue every change for approval unless auto-approve is on for this workflow.
Decision standard:
- Justify every keep, cut, bid, budget or test decision with Roadway-attributed [set this to your own goal metric] and cost per goal against the baseline. Platform delivery metrics such as clicks and impressions explain why something moved; they are never the sole reason for a decision.
- Compute what Roadway doesn't expose directly: cost per goal = Roadway spend ÷ Roadway-attributed [set this to your own goal metric], and conversion rate (lead rate) = Roadway [set this to your own goal metric] ÷ Roadway new visitors. Don't substitute platform-reported conversions or conversion rates.
- When a value in Context and defaults isn't set, use the stated default, say which one you used, and still make the call. Don't stop to ask.
- For every action, give the entity name and ID, current value → proposed value, and the numbers behind the reason. Write "None" under any empty heading.
- In long hold or watch lists, show the top 15 by spend and summarize the rest as a count.
Give me a report of each with reasoning for each action. Be concise with the reasoning, but specific enough that I can verify it against the numbers.
Report structure:
Snapchat bid strategy experiments report
Summary:
The experiments running, their results, and the changes applied.
Launch experiment:
- [campaign / experiment] - [reason]
Apply winner:
- [campaign / experiment] - [reason]
End experiment:
- [campaign / experiment] - [reason]
Not eligible:
- [campaign / experiment] - [reason]
## Run it in Roadway
https://www.roadwayai.com/workflows/test-bid-strategies-with-controlled-experiments-for-snapchat-ads
Uses native split tests to prove whether a different Snapchat bid strategy or target actually beats the current one. It sets up the test, keeps the split fair, and only calls a winner once there is enough data. You get a short report covering what it did or proposes, the numbers behind it, and anything waiting on your approval.
